12-01-2016, 04:54 AM
(This post was last modified: 12-02-2016, 12:38 AM by LPC.
Edit Reason: Missing word
)
Catherine, I saw your initial post but didn't have time to reply until now. I did, however, start a thread about it on two other forums, as I felt it deserved an airing.
Here is what I wrote in my latest post on AF:
"I suspect that they thought they could make lots of money because of something "new". But the public reaction shows what people thought of the idea. The attraction park has claimed that the fish were already dead when they were frozen, but I suspect that this is just a public relations damage limitation cover-up. The fish can be seen in one photo with all their mouths gaping wide open. Also, I doubt whether the attraction park bought old, already dead fish which were no longer fit for consumption (as it claims), as such fish could have presented a health risk. So the poor fish were probably frozen alive.
Eating sentient creatures for food is one thing, but killing them to be used as a skating attraction only is another thing."
I find the whole idea abhorrent and upsetting.
Here is what I wrote in my latest post on AF:
"I suspect that they thought they could make lots of money because of something "new". But the public reaction shows what people thought of the idea. The attraction park has claimed that the fish were already dead when they were frozen, but I suspect that this is just a public relations damage limitation cover-up. The fish can be seen in one photo with all their mouths gaping wide open. Also, I doubt whether the attraction park bought old, already dead fish which were no longer fit for consumption (as it claims), as such fish could have presented a health risk. So the poor fish were probably frozen alive.
Eating sentient creatures for food is one thing, but killing them to be used as a skating attraction only is another thing."
I find the whole idea abhorrent and upsetting.
