05-26-2014, 06:11 AM
Thank you LPC! The articles are fascinating.
Re: the National Geographic article....it strikes me that if the genome relationships are striking enough to show up even in the one-and-a-half times (shallow) sequencing method, as opposed to the high level (and probably more detailed?) sequencing, then they must be very pronounced.
So very interesting! I like that, I have to admit.
The only negative consideration....I just hope these findings don't lead to more abuse of dogs in laboratories....
One day maybe our compassion will meet up with our need to know.
Re: the National Geographic article....it strikes me that if the genome relationships are striking enough to show up even in the one-and-a-half times (shallow) sequencing method, as opposed to the high level (and probably more detailed?) sequencing, then they must be very pronounced.
So very interesting! I like that, I have to admit.
The only negative consideration....I just hope these findings don't lead to more abuse of dogs in laboratories....
One day maybe our compassion will meet up with our need to know.
