07-12-2014, 02:53 PM
If they are willing to have a dog serve as a soldier, then they owe him the same respect that they give to any soldier.
Isn't the motto "No man left behind". In this case by "man" they mean serving military personnel. So far they have failed Colonel.
When a police dog or even a police horse is killed it is treated as the death of a police officer.
So the capture of a military dog should be treated as any other prisoner of war situation. At least there is no bad news about Colonel.
Isn't the motto "No man left behind". In this case by "man" they mean serving military personnel. So far they have failed Colonel.
When a police dog or even a police horse is killed it is treated as the death of a police officer.
So the capture of a military dog should be treated as any other prisoner of war situation. At least there is no bad news about Colonel.
Catherine


