Here's hoping the the practise is the same in Australia.
Posts: 17,132
Threads: 5,905
Joined: Jan 1970
Reputation:
78
I think we are going to see change. No one is happy about how hatcheries treat new born chicks. Too many of us have seen videos of male chicks tossed live into a grinder. Once the public knows and objects, the big companies will have to pay attention no matter where in the world they are.
I think Australia already has strong campaigns against cage eggs in the first place. It is all part of treating chickens better.
Catherine
Posts: 2,474
Threads: 109
Joined: Nov 2013
Reputation:
28
It's a pity that the company is not implementing this until 2020, but any ultimate reduction in animal suffering is to welcomed.
Posts: 17,132
Threads: 5,905
Joined: Jan 1970
Reputation:
78
I find myself wondering why they are going to take so long to change. Are they hoping that we will forget about it and they can stay the same.
If something is so terrible that it must be stopped, why wouldn't they stop it! Stop it right now!
Four years is too long. We need to pressure them to change their treatment of chicks right away. I wonder if there are any new petitions out that suggest a more timely response.
Catherine
Posts: 5,150
Threads: 419
Joined: Nov 2013
Reputation:
33
I was also wondering why there has to be such a long wait for these changes! I saw '2017' mentioned, but initially it mentioned '2020' which is four years!
Even the solution isn't perfect, but is a great step forward.
Posts: 17,132
Threads: 5,905
Joined: Jan 1970
Reputation:
78
I just looked at the article again and the 2017 date is for Germany. They are finding a way to do in-ovo sex selection. I do not know how that works. We need to look into it further.
Unilever took a stand against killing male chicks in 2014 and intends to use in-ovo sex selection. I do not know if they have achieved it yet, but they are an important company.
It is the United Egg Producers who plan to change by 2020. I think they need to move a little faster than that.
Catherine
Posts: 346
Threads: 8
Joined: Nov 2013
Reputation:
6
07-09-2016, 01:06 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-09-2016, 01:09 PM by AnimalFamily.)
This is disgusting. I had no idea.
Although I am a little skeptical of the whole "in-ovo egg sexing." thing as well.
I would need more info as to the safety of the "termination" process.
I don't completely understand why the male chicks cannot be used for other things, raised humanely of course, then harvested for dog foods etc.?
Also just because "broilers" are bred to be larger, doesn't mean the quality of the meat is any better?
I have eaten roosters and have noticed absolutely no difference in flavor of the meat.
We have different grades of beef and such. The smaller chickens could carry a smaller price tag.
I also find it interesting that most humans would be "grossed" out by fertilized eggs.
Most people I know in my neck of the woods have a rooster with their hens for many reasons.
Therefore we get fertilized eggs.
When collected [as they should be] on a daily basis, that fertilization goes nowhere.
You only see a tiny white dot in your egg yolk and you really have to look to see it.
It doesn't seem to bother anyone I know, lol.
Posts: 346
Threads: 8
Joined: Nov 2013
Reputation:
6
I agree.
Even when I [rarely] do have to buy eggs at the store, I only buy free range.
The little extra they charge is a small price to pay for some peace of mind.
I seriously doubt anyone could tell a difference in taste.