Posts: 2,476
Threads: 109
Joined: Nov 2013
Reputation:
28
What this charity is doing is wonderful. Good find, Catherine.
However, I am outraged at this part of the article:
"In many states, including in Texas, labs are allowed to get animals from shelters and use them for testing."
I am amazed that the shelters agree to let stray animals be used in this way. They presumably check out private individuals carefully before letting them take an animal (at least they do checks in the UK and France). So how come it is OK for the shelters to allow the animals to be taken by a laboratory for painful tests? That is hardly "going to a good home".
I am tempted to say, "That could only happen in America", but perhaps this appalling practice is carried out in some other countries. I don't have evidence. But I suspect that phenomenon is unique to America.
Posts: 17,151
Threads: 5,919
Joined: Jan 1970
Reputation:
78
I don't know if it happens in all states, but in some places city run shelters are considered "pounds" and they can legally take in strays. They can also be forced or obliged to give up strays to labs. In some places that is the law, but it doesn't actually happen.
Private shelters, who raise their own funds, can't be forced to do this. I assume an SPCA shelter could not be forced to do this.
I think it is still a clause in the rules for animal services here in Toronto, but no animal has been surrendered to a lab in a very, very long time. They are working at changing the bylaws, but these things take time.
I would hope the shelters that used to surrender animals to a lab would find a way to block this from happening.
If they don't then why do they bother to interview people before they get an animal. It seems a bit hypocritical.
The Beagle Freedom Project is a wonderful thing. They rescue the animals, but they also raise awareness of animals that are being used in labs. Having pets in the community who used to be lab specimens should really raise awareness of the plight of lab animals.
Catherine
Posts: 17,151
Threads: 5,919
Joined: Jan 1970
Reputation:
78
I would hope that actual "charity" shelters would never release animals to a lab. I think it is only ones that are under city bylaws. Some cities still have bylaws that allow this to happen. I don't know that the shelters were ever paid for animals that were sent to labs. It is a practice that dates back to another time and very different thinking. It fits with shelters that routinely killed healthy animals.
There are less of those kinds of shelters around.
I don't know if the size of the shelter makes a difference. I think who founded it and who has the final say about shelter business has more of an influence over shelter policy. Shelters that are over crowded now have a lot of options. The animals can be transferred to other shelters and there are special groups that will do the transfer.
There is no need to kill lab animals when they are no longer needed. Groups like the Beagle Freedom Project will find them homes. There is a lot of hope for the future because there are some really good people working to help animals in need.
Catherine