03-28-2014, 01:31 PM
Maybe it is too soon for Fukushima. Right now there are mutations and things look bad for the area.
I think initially things looked bad for Chernobyl. The trees in the area all died and there were mutations. It has been more than 25 years so nature has sorted itself out. There would still be a higher mutation rate, but the natural order is reasserting itself. The ecological balance is returning. First the beavers went wild with dams and flooded everything they could. Now the wolves are getting some of the beavers so some of the land dries out. That is a normal cycle.
I wonder what Fukushima will look like is 5 or 10 years.
I think initially things looked bad for Chernobyl. The trees in the area all died and there were mutations. It has been more than 25 years so nature has sorted itself out. There would still be a higher mutation rate, but the natural order is reasserting itself. The ecological balance is returning. First the beavers went wild with dams and flooded everything they could. Now the wolves are getting some of the beavers so some of the land dries out. That is a normal cycle.
I wonder what Fukushima will look like is 5 or 10 years.
![[Image: IMG_9091.JPG]](https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-rtQnRVnpHuw/Upv4HXYM20I/AAAAAAAAAqo/K5MmSTvkZdA/w296-h229-p-no/IMG_9091.JPG)
Catherine
